Three grants, sixty-five years apart
The Corporation of Masters of the Noble Science of Defence held its authority from the Crown. That authority was set down in royal letters patent, a species of warrant that named the masters and provosts, rehearsed the disorder they were to correct, and armed them with powers of search, arrest and binding-over. Three of these grants survive, and they are gathered here.
The first, of 1540, comes from Henry VIII and is preserved only as a brief calendar abstract. The third, of 1605, comes from James I by way of Rymer's Foedera. Between them sits a gap of sixty-five years and the reigns of three monarchs, broken only by the letter at the centre of this edition: a Marian warrant of 1555, discovered in the Exeter city archives, which witnesses Henry's original and so carries his 1540 text forward in an English body framed by chancery Latin.
Only the 1555 letter survives as a full transcription set against a modernisation, so only there does the parallel view apply. The 1540 and 1605 texts are given as single reading columns. Where the Marian scribe's paper is torn or faded, the transcription shows the loss in square brackets and, where the sense is recoverable from the other two grants, supplies a reading in the same brackets; nothing has been invented to fill a gap. Use the control bar to move between the modernised reading, the parallel view and the diplomatic transcription, and read the appendices to see the three grants measured against one another.
The commission of 1540
Ric. Beste, Humphry Bassett, Rob. Polwarth, John Legge, Peter Beste, Philip Williams, Ric. Lord, John Vincent, Nic. de la Haye, Masters of the Science of Defence, and Will Hunt, John Frye, Hen. Whytehead, Gilbert Bekett, Edw. Pynner, Thos. Tourner, Jeffrey Gryffyn, Thos. Hudson, Thos. Tymsey, Hen. Thyklyppes, and John ap. Ryce, provosts of the said science.
Commission to enquire and search in all parts of England, Wales, and Ireland for persons being Scholars of ye said Science of Defence, many of whom, regardless of their oathes made to their Masters on first entering to learn the said Science, upon the cross of a sword in remembrance of the Cross whereon Our Lord suffered, have for their own lucre of their unsociable covetous minds, without sufficient licence, resorted to all parts of England, keeping open schools and taking great sums for their labours, and yet have insufficiently instructed their scholars to the great slander of the Masters and Provosts of the Science and of the good and laudable Orders and Rules of the same, and to take any Scholar so misusing himself before the nearest justice of the Peace to be bound over in sufficient sureties not to repeat his offences against his said oathe and the said Orders and Rules or in case of refusal, to be committed to gaol.
West. 20 July, 32 Henry VIII. Del. West. 20 July S.B. [1540].
The Marian warrant of 1555
The warrant of 1605
JAMES by the Grace of God, etc, to our well-beloved subjects William Joyner, Edmund Darcy, John Evans, Richard Fletcher, James Cranidge, John Matthews, John Harrys, Thomas Norreys, John Turner, John Bradshaw, and Thomas Valentyne, Masters of ye Noble Science of Defence GREETINGS.
FORASMUCH as divers and many schollers professing ye said Science, Men of lewde and dissolute Lyfe, little or nothing regarding their Oathes made before ye Masters of ye said Science, but only coveting and desiring their own singular Lucre and Advantage, without any sufficient Licence or lawful Authoritye doe resort into everye Countrye and Parts of this Our Realme of England, from Towne to Towne and from Place to Place, and there doe take upon them to keep open Schools for the Instruction of Our Subjects in ye said Science of Defence, and doe take greate Summes of Money for their Labours, themselves being very unskilfull and insufficient in ye same, whereby our saide Subjects are greatly illuded, deceaved and indaungered to ye great Discredit of ye said Science and ye Slaunder, and Hindrance of ye Masters of ye said Science of Defence and to ye utter Subvention and Destruction of ye good and laudable Orders and Rules of ye said Science if dew Penaltye is not in Time provided:
KNOW YE that Wee, willing to provide for dew Reformacioun and speedy Correctioun of ye Premisses, geive unto you and every one of you full Power and Authoritye to enquire, view and search by all ye lawfull and convenient Waies and Meanes that you best may or can, in all Citties, Burroughes, Townes and other places whatsoever, within this Our Realm of England, Wales, and Ireland, and ye Marches of ye same, as well within Liberties as without, of, for, and concerning all such Persons being or pretendying to be Schollers or Professors of ye said Science of Defence that shall herinafter disorderly or contentiously abuse or misuse themselves in this said Science of Defence contrary to their Oathes and the ancient and lawful Orders and Rules of the said Science, and if you or any of you by the said Inquiry, View, Search, or other Waies and Meanes lawfull doe fynde any Person or Persons being or pre-tendyng to be Schollers or Professors of ye said Science that shall abuse him or themselves in the Premisses or any of them contrary to their said Oathes, Rules and Orders aforesaid, that then you shall take or cause to be taken ye said Person or Persons so offending, and him or them bring or cause to be brought before the nearest Justice of Our Peace in any of our Counties, Citties, Burroughs, Townes or other Places within Our Realm aforesaid, Wales, Ireland, or other ye Marches of ye same. there, if sufficient cause shall appear to any such Justice, to be bound with sufficient Sureties for him or them unto Us, Our Heires, Successors, in good and lawfull Summes of Money to be paid to Us, Our Heires, and Successors at certayn Days by the Justice to be limited that he or they shall not hereafter misuse him or them selves or does any Thing contrary to the ancient and lawfull Rules and Orders of ye said Science.
AND IF any Person or Persons soe offending doe refuse to be bound with sufficient Sureties for him or them as is aforesaid, then we will that the said Justice shall commit the said Person or Persons to the next Gaol, there to remayn untill such Time as he be thence delivered according to the Laws of the Realm, and Therefore We command you that you and every one of you doe diligently intend about the Premisses and doe execute with effecte.
AND THEREFORE We will and straightly by these Presents command all Maiors, Sheriffes, Bayliffes, and all other Our Officers Ministers and Subjects whatsoever they be, that they, as well within Liberties as without, be aydynge, helpynge and assis-tynge to the said Masters in and about the execution of this Our Commission.
WITNESS the King at Westminster the sixth Day of July, Per Breve de Privato Sigillo.
The Corporation across the reigns
The three surviving warrants span the years 1540 to 1605, but the monopoly itself ran on until the Statute of Monopolies swept it away in 1624. Two long reigns, Edward VI's and Elizabeth's, left no warrant at all, so the record we have is a matter of survival rather than of the grant lapsing.
The men named in the warrants
Each grant opens with a roll of masters and provosts. Read in sequence, the rolls tell their own story: the provost rank, eleven strong in 1540, thins to four in 1555 and vanishes altogether in 1605, while the master rank edges upward. A handful of men bridge the first two warrants, several of them rising from provost to master; by 1605, fifty years on, the personnel have turned over completely.
The weight of words
The three grants say much the same thing at very different lengths. Henry's 1540 abstract is terse; the Marian letter of 1555, with its Latin frame and its witness clause, is by far the fullest; James's 1605 warrant settles in between. The counts below track both the total wording and the number of distinct words, a rough measure of how much fresh vocabulary each version introduces.
Latin and English in the Marian warrant
The 1555 letter is bilingual by design. Chancery Latin opens the document (the royal style and the inspeximus formula) and closes it (the enrolment and witness clause), while the operative body, which reproduces Henry's English letter almost word for word, runs in English between them. The Latin is not incidental: it marks the document as an enrolled instrument of record, and its Marian phrasing carries a Catholic colouring that the Protestant 1540 original lacks.
What stayed, what changed
For all their differences of length and language, the grants are remarkably stable in substance. About eighty-five per cent of the shared wording carries from 1540 into 1555, and about eighty-two per cent from 1555 into 1605. The core grievance and the enforcement machinery scarcely move; what shifts is the legal formality and the political colouring of the moment.